Last week I noticed I was being hacked on Facebook. It was quite a shock. I naively believed that if I changed my password enough and kept my account as secure as possible then it wouldn’t happen to me.
I use Facebook for my business but also to share pictures of my daughter who is only two. Her dad and I are not keen on sharing our little cherub elsewhere, so they remain firmly in my personal account for family and friends.
I discovered the violation when a post appeared in my name on a Facebook page that discusses local politics. It was done in a manner that screamed ‘look at me, in your account’. It wasn’t very subtle… A comment straight under one of my own.
I guess the urge to peacock became overwhelming.
I immediately accessed my Facebook log to see who was logged on as ‘me’ and found a disturbing history of log-ins from other operating systems and locations around Portsmouth. If you want to do the same, its under Security/Where you’re logged on.
I had my suspicions so I copied the Facebook log and sent it off to a web whizz.
The report returned to me indeed confirmed that someone had indeed been having a jolly old time in my Facebook account.
And here is Scott Chegg claiming he is not Paul Nelson on the same politics page. Right…(a hint – numerous profiles, one writing style).
I can’t say I am surprised about any of this, and this is where things go a bit deeper.
Last year I set up a petition relating to a local ‘community’ page called Spotted Portsmouth. The page had published an image of a woman whose underwear was on show as a result of her skirt ridding up. A prolific amount of abusive comments followed. The page also allowed comments that speculated on her identity and where her children went to school. The woman who was the subject of the photo did try several times to get the image removed, with no success.
The petition made our local news. I declined to comment at the time as I felt too many voices would detract from the severity of the issue. Instead Shonagh Dillon, CEO of Aurora New Dawn (AND), a local domestic violence charity, commented.
Like magic, a post attacking Shonagh and AND appeared on Spotted Portsmouth shortly thereafter.
‘MA Goldman’, a chap also with a very distinctive writing style, swiftly published a rather hasty missive on the little used Spotted Portsmouth blog.
Spotted claims it is run by team of people who merely post what they were sent in by members of the public. They deny creating content. But this doesn’t add up and they have never provided any evidence to back up their claim of a team of moderators.
Instead, there has been clear pattern of the page being used a personal platform for grievances and vendettas.
Other previous Spotted delights included ‘ XXX is the biggest cunt in Portsmouth. Discuss’.
Not long after the petition was set up, a friend of mine who had recently been featured in the NME discovered one morning that her feature picture had been doctored with the image of a pig and published on the Spotted Portsmouth page. She also happen to run a feminist group at the time, which had been discussing the page.
After the petition launched something interesting happened: I started to receive messages of support from people wanting to share their experiences of being bullied or harassed either by the page or the person behind it.
Messages telling me that the page had falsely tried to accuse a man of paedophilia. That businesses had been targeted. Personal testimonies from the people of Portsmouth.
In hindsight I should have probably started checking my activity log then.
Amazingly, even a current Portsmouth City councillor even got in touch to share their info, keen to name the person behind the account and share a link to their conviction.
Moving back to the current issue. With a security buff at hand I figured now would be a good time to see if there was any connection to my hacker, the above profiles – and Spotted Portsmouth.
Have you guessed the answer yet?
‘The IP that was used to access your profile, and the one associated with those profiles, is also associated with Spotted Portsmouth. He looks to use deflectors by either using a Trusted Proxy, or VPN (Virtual Private Network) – these show a different IP address to the rest of the world, thus showcasing a different location, hiding web history, avoids leaving a digital footprint etc. I’d guess he’ll be using a VPN, probably Hide My Ass as that is the easiest system to use for an amateur…’
The answer was ‘yes’.
In a nutshell, you can hide all you want, but you still leave a footprint for those who are looking for them.
Spotted Portsmouth have always strenuously denied any links to Paul Nelson. Tellingly, and comments linking him to the contents of SP have been instantly deleted.
Now lets add a little cherry to the cake.
Take a look at the caption to this photo.
And so we come full circle.
What I am surprised about is how little recourse there is to stop this happening, and I have a very strong feeling that I am not the only person that has been targeted.
Yesterday I called the Police to report the breach. After taking sometime to figure out if it was a crime, they told me all they could do was advise that I tighten my security settings.
And this is why I have published this blog. We have a man convicted by a court of harassment (via Facebook amongst other things), involved in a sizable ‘community page’, hacking my account and using countless other profiles. And he is free to continue, until someone else finds out they have been hacked. Even then, he is free to continue.
And Portsmouth is lumbered with a so called community page with a totally opaque moderation ‘team’ that is being conveniently used as personal soap box, and worse.
Does this sound right to you? And Facebook, how are you letting this happen? You are allowing people to build up and hide behind followings that are then used for nefarious purposes.
Has this happened in your town? I am curious to hear.
Last week I did a giant pole vault over the perimeters of my comfort zone and landed firmly in uncharted territory: Protestlandia.
I live in Portsmouth. I am a mother with a lovely partner and a small, but nice home by the sea. I lead a pleasant life ensconced firmly in the middle classes. I buy and sell pretty things for a living.
But around me things are starting to erode. Little chips and drip drips. They may not be affecting me but what of the people who are already suffering from cuts that only serve to improve a balance sheet?
I’ve recently opened my eyes to the wider world. If you take your privileges for granted then you run the risk of losing them. So off we went – myself, my partner and a few friends – down to the protest against huge cuts to Domestic Violence services, taking place outside Portsmouth City Council.
Just before leaving I had pondered the challenges of going to an outdoor protest. Must be 1) warm and 2) have presence. Huge Emmanuelle-esque shoulders attached to a vintage tweed Laura Ashley riding coat and a hat did the trick – see this huge skirt? That’s my own portable perimeter. Always wear wide clothes when you don’t want your personal space to be compromised.
It was bitter weather but I was warmed to see that there were other ‘normal folk’ like me joining the politicians, seasoned protesters, various left-wing tribes and of course the ladies of the moment, Sisters Uncut.
To be honest, I also wanted to get a good look at Scott Harris. I wanted to study his face to see if there was a glimmer of remorse. You may have read about him here, here, here, and here. I would have felt this way had he been a councillor of any party.
Back to the protest. ‘After an hour of solidarity on the steps of our iconic Guildhall, we filed into the upper galleries of the council chamber. I was looking forward to hearing what everyone had to say. Unbeknownst to us we were in the row directly behind Sisters Uncut (it’s quite dark up there). When the confetti popper (not a ‘firearm’, nor a ‘weapon’) burst I must admit it did make us jump but only because we were at such close proximity. We all burst out laughing.
There we were, three normal mamas (and one papa), agog at the guts and gumption of these youngsters. In my opinion these women are the Suffragettes of our era and I will never forget seeing them in action. I can only hope my one grows up with such conviction and courage in her heart.
The leader of the council left in a bit of huff. She looked annoyed, peeved, impatient…but not particularly scared as she later claimed.
The message sent out was loud and clear: these cuts are dangerous, the ‘provisions’ are insufficient and this is clearly the only way government will take notice.
Unfortunately we had to leave soon after said confetti shower since we all had children to collect from nursery/school and you can imagine trying to explain that one: ‘Sorry we are all currently being detained at her Majesty’s pleasure due to being confused with Sisters Uncut. Little Jemima will be picked up by her gran shortly’.
On the way out we witnessed members of Sisters Uncut being pushed back by the police. One of their own was being detained behind guarded doors. On her own, without any representation, by gung-ho guildhall security staff while police guarded the door. It felt over the top and heavy handed.
I thought that might have been the end of the show, but no. The real comedy villain appeared later on at the council meeting and I only heard about it via social media.
Introducing Councillor New; The Judy to Harris’s Punch.
His increasingly heated diatribe at Shona Dillon, the CEO of Domestic Violence Charity Aurora New Dawn, just gets shriller and odder. It all turns into a giant game of ‘he said, she said’.
He did this knowing Dillon had no right of reply. This is not the first time he has personally attacked her. According to local political pundits, he is well known for being rude. I’m sure she felt truly ‘enlightened’. New makes me think more of a petulant child enjoying grassing up another, rather than an elected councillor. The naughty step for you New.
I’ll leave you to judge for yourselves.
So there you have it. We have a local council dedicated to cuts; merrily closing ranks to protect their own rotten apples, a bungling councillor who can’t use email, a national protest group having to resort to theatrics to get their message across and a councillor claiming a local domestic violence charity are somehow responsible for the actions of national juggernauts, Sisters Uncut.
And in the midst of all this Portsmouth is yet again in the national news for all the wrong reasons. They should move the whole shebang to the Kings Theatre and call it what it is: a pantomime.
Surprised by how you feel at today’s news? Well so was I.
It started with shock and disbelief and then the tears trickled into a hot sticky torrent. By 11 am I was home alone, blubbing.
I have to confess, the death of David Bowie hit me harder than any family death I have yet to experience (at this point I should add, they have been mercifully few and far between). With elderly relatives I felt sad for the spouses and children they left behind. Today this grief was my own.
I refuse to feel ashamed or embarrassed for feeling intensely sad at the passing of someone I didn’t know personally. I will not dismiss my own feelings. Enough people do that for me.
We have the freedom to choose who, and what, we care about.
Good art transcends the sensory experience. It creates and evoques memories. Hearing a song can pull you back quicker in time than time moves forward. If he accompanied and shaped your upbringing then it is personal. Bowie didn’t belong to me or you, but he lived in little pockets of our lives.
If you want to plaster Facebook with links and tributes, do it. You will feel better. And it’s ok to feel sad when there is one less thing out there to provide colour, escapism and emotional respite.
Someone has left the planet that made a lot of people feel better about being different.
Someone has gone who contributed a lot of beauty to this world.
We won’t be getting one of these again.
If that is not reason enough to be sad, then I don’t know what is.
The lady to go to for vintage home wear and the organiser of arguable the best vintage fair for shopping in the UK has joined our Style Me Vintage family. Keeley Harris has penned Style Me Vintage, Homes (Pavilion books) an ode to all things house and home. Her book is beautifully designed, full of colour and laid out in the style I set with Style Me Vintage Clothes (decade by decade, introductions to vintage, suggestions where to shop).
I found it clearly written and satisfyingly devoid of hyperbole. Its is truly a feast for the eyes and my pics don’t do it justice. This book shows you how to do retro style with colour, not darkness and dust. As an avid collector myself, it’s the little snippets of previously unknown information that give me the instant hit of gratification. I admit I didn’t know that Art Deco is a term that was coined in the 60s. It simply never occurred to me to question the origins. You can tell the author is a lover of china. Lots of collectables that I have seen before are featured, which allowed me to put a name to pattern. A good friendly mix of practical and historical, I liked Keeleys’ helpful suggestions for alternatives: bamboo frames of all eras for a 20s living room for example. Keeley touches on one of my favourite thing: THAT 30s green – but why were so many things made in that colour?
SMVH is a visual feast, peppered with good knowledge and useful suggestions. I particularly liked the fact that she touched on modern visions of vintage style, such as Eclectic ( my own home) and Industrial – a style I first saw in France. I know first hand how hard it to cover decades of design in one book and I think Keeley has more than done this justice.
NB – no matter how high the res, WordPress is blurring all my pics – does anyone know how to sort this?
This week my publishers Pavilion and dear friend Liz are launching something a little bit different: A Style Me Vintage book dedicated to one era: the 1940s. There was only ever going to be one person to do this era justice. Having recently completed an MA on ‘British ready-to-wear 1946-66’, Liz knows this decade inside out. We are talking about the woman who can spot a Horrockses from a mile off, date it to the year and tell you the person who designed the print.
The 1940s is a divisive decade for vintage lovers. People either seem to love the ‘make do and mend’ element or loathe it. Reenactors can obsess over it yet it has been somewhat marketed as drab in this country. This is about to change: Liz is on a mission to dispel myths. The look and palate of her book are instantly 1940s – but the drabness associated with this era is very much absent. Nor is it full of clichés or stereotypes and the abundance of novelty prints and evening dresses is a visual delight. The level of knowledge shared in this tome is astounding, but this will come as no surprise if you are a follower of her blog.
Liz effortlessly seams together the decade on both sides of pond, with nods towards trends in Germany and France. One forgets just how much went on fashion-wise in the 1940s. Being the decade primarily associated with wartime frugality in this country, we forget that the second half of the decade saw the explosion of another kind: The ‘New Look’. Liz dutifully takes us full throttle into post-war milestones and beyond.
As a dealer I love discovering information that helps to identify a dress. Who knew that black garments were rarely found in the UK as too much dye was needed? If that is not enough, Liz really flexes her historian muscles with her introductions on the Theatre of Fashion, Parisian scarf hats and the Zazous – an early French subculture. The book also covers weddings, swimwear, uniforms, as well as hair and make-up. In all, a complete compendium to the 1940s look.
Even if the 40s is not the era that most piques your interest, this is an excellent read for any vintage lover, history buff or fashion aficionado. This book is saturated with history, tips and insider knowledge that can only come from the rare, if not unique, combination of being a top notch fashion historian and fully paid up vintage lover, wearer and collector. This book certainly does not provide style at the expense of substance. This is just a hunch but I have a funny feeling this book is probably superior in its content than the one created to go alongside ‘Fashion on the Ration’ – the current exhibition at the Imperial War Museum… Style Me Vintage, 1940s is published this Thursday by Pavilion.